![]() ![]() That’s one reason China has been on a charm offensive with global business. On Friday, the Labor Department will publish monthly jobs numbers economists polled by Reuters have predicted that employers added 225,000 new jobs last month. Markets will look at how many officials at the central bank feel that multiple rate increases would be needed this year to tamp down inflation. This afternoon, the Fed will publish minutes from its rate-setting meeting last month. The return of the El Niño phenomenon is likely to fuel temperature rises, and climate officials urged more action on cutting the use of fossil fuels.Ī short but packed week awaits investors. Tuesday saw an average worldwide temperature of 17.2 degrees Celsius (about 63 degrees Fahrenheit), the latest example of extreme weather battering people from China to India to Texas. While there’s little chance at the moment of Section 230 being overturned, Doughty’s ruling raises the prospect that some kinds of pressure about revising tech regulations might be viewed as improper pressure on tech companies. (It’s worth noting that the Trump administration also made noise about rethinking Section 230.) Meanwhile, plaintiffs in this case have argued that the Biden administration had threatened tech companies by floating moves to revise antitrust law or Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, the legal shield protecting online platforms from lawsuits over user content. Other Republican state officials have moved to ban internet platforms from taking down some political content, which legal experts say are likely to wend their way to the Supreme Court. ![]() The injunction may have wider consequences for tech regulation. “It can’t be that the government violates the First Amendment simply by engaging with the platforms about their content-moderation decisions and policies,” Jameel Jaffer of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University told The Times.Įxperts are also worried disinformation will only increase on social platforms, which have already cut their content moderation teams. And other government officials, including lawmakers, can still reach out to social platforms.Ĭritics of the ruling say it’s too broad and problematic, especially because it applies to government efforts to encourage action by companies, not force it. Kennedy cheered the decision: “Happy Independence Day Everyone!,” he tweeted.ĭoughty listed some exceptions in his ruling, including in instances involving crimes, national security threats or foreign attempts to influence elections. In their lawsuit, the plaintiffs cited emails and text messages in which, they claimed, federal officials had pressured tech executives to remove or censor posts about federal pandemic policies, articles about Hunter Biden, election security and other issues.ĭoughty also pointed to efforts to remove or play down content by Robert Kennedy Jr., the anti-vaccine activist who is now challenging President Biden for the Democratic presidential nomination. It’s a win for Republican state attorneys general who sued the administration, arguing that federal officials were seeking to curtail users’ First Amendment rights. Doughty, who was appointed by President Donald Trump. ![]() “If the allegations made by plaintiffs are true, the present case arguably involves the most massive attack against free speech in United States’ history,” said Mr. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana said that broad parts of the government, including the Department of Health and Human Services and the F.B.I., couldn’t talk with social media companies in any way that would lead to the “removal, deletion, suppression or reduction” of content. The ruling: Judge Terry Doughty of the U.S. It also complicates the outlook for regulating tech companies over the content their users post. The 155-page ruling, which the administration is likely to appeal, raises questions about how the government is supposed to interact with platforms that reach billions of people. Government efforts to interact with social media platforms took a major hit on Tuesday when a federal judge restricted the Biden administration from communicating with tech companies about a broad array of online content. A new hole emerges in Washington’s social media efforts ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |